Rankings of tools by how plainly their terms speak
One ranking reads the register's 24 tools by how many of five upload clauses their own terms spell out. SceneMixer and Topview head it. As of 2026-09-25.
The ranking takes the six parts of an AI video tool's terms that the register already files, keeps the five that bear on a book, and gives each tool a point for every one it addresses in so many words. The wording itself is quoted on the register's pages with the day it was read.
A count of clauses is a count of what the terms say, not of what they mean for an author. A tool with long, detailed terms can outscore one with short, fair ones, and a clause stated plainly may still be one a rightsholder would decline. The ranking page says what is counted, how ties fall and what the order cannot tell you.
Nothing on this site is legal advice. The register records what each tool's terms say so that a reader can see the wording for themselves, and the ranking only sorts the tools by how much of the subject their terms cover.
Every row links the tool's own site and the register page behind each clause it earned, so a total can be traced back to the words on a page.
1The rankings
- Clear terms for a book — Five clauses an upload to an AI video tool touches, counted by how plainly each tool's terms spell them out.
Rows are tools whose own terms were read; how terms are read sets out what counts as spelling a clause out, and the upload clauses hold every reading.